True and false autonomy

How to practice fire eyes

It is worth noting that localization is not exactly equal to autonomy, safety and control.

At present, there is no “autonomous controllable” standard in the industry, which has also led to some manufacturers to borrow brand localization, put foreign technology and products on the “vest” of localization, claiming “autonomous controllable”; Some manufacturers have a limited degree of autonomy, and the “life door” of key core technologies is still in the hands of others.

So how to sharpen the eyes to distinguish “true and false autonomy”? Referring to the evaluation dimension of software and hardware autonomy and controllability proposed by Ni Guangnan, academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, we believe that there are mainly the following points:

◉ First, intellectual property rights shall be independent and controllable. The technical content and intellectual property of software are often concentrated in the source code and the technical logic behind the source code, so software manufacturers must have all the source code of the software, especially the underlying root technology, and need to ensure the integrity and continuity of their intellectual property rights, so as to maintain this lifeline and maximize the protection of user data security and business sustainability and inheritance.

8273-2046

◉ The second is the autonomy and control of technical capabilities. Technical ability mainly refers to the R & D team that can master the core technology, imagine even if you have intellectual property rights, tens of millions of lines of code no one can understand, how useful this intellectual property can be? This also puts forward higher technical requirements for the core team of software manufacturers, including the ability to industrialization, the ability to build industrial chains and ecosystems. A team with knowledge of intellectual property rights and core technologies is crucial and indispensable for product iteration of 3D CAD, the provision of industry solutions, and long-term strategic cooperation with users and ecological partners.

◉ Third, the initiative for development is independent and controllable. This requires software manufacturers to independently modify the source code and procedures according to demand, and can be applied to a wide range of business scenarios, commercial software is to ensure that the product in the development of new functions, architecture transformation, sales region, application industry is not subject to others. For users, 3D CAD software is a “black box”, which is difficult to visually see the source code to judge, so it can also be inferred by whether the software can be sold to global and wide range of industry customers.

In recent years, the industrial software industry has become very hot, and domestic software manufacturers have made a lot of attempts, but also a lot of chaos. Want to distinguish the authenticity in a number of domestic 3D CAD manufacturers that boast of “autonomous and controllable”, source code intellectual property, production and research team, and development initiative, all three are indispensable.